I don't tend to look at the news as much when I'm away from work (it's not that I spend my time skiving off and reading news, I do actually need to be aware on what's going on in certain topic areas) so I only saw the story that Prozac doesn't work today.
As someone who has taken Prozac for most of the last ten years, I'm obviously more than a little biased, plus I take it for anxiety, not depression. But if it is like a placebo, why is it the only medication that has taken any effect on my anxiety? Why does it make a significant difference when I have a relapse and need to go back on it? Why did Seroxat (a similar anti-depressant, also in the study) not do me any good and in fact made me feel ill, but Prozac didn't?
I do wonder if they are over-prescribed, and there are issues with people being given medication when they might benefit from therapy more, but it simply isn't available (although I do also believe that medication can give you the strength you need to deal with therapy). I have some concerns about the government's 'army of therapists' (I don't know if this is in Scotland as well as England, health is a devolved matter) and the idea of cognitive behavioural therapy being the miracle cure we all need. I'm sure it works really well for many people but mental illness is a tricky thing and what works for one person doesn't always work well for another. You also have to remember that some people have mental health problems due to a chemical imbalance in the brain (given other cases of anxiety in my family I have reason to believe that I may be one of them) and no amount of therapy will cure this. It might help, as we all need to talk to people, and CBT can help you deal with problems (I've used some of the principles myself), but it's not necessarily a cure-all.
I'll watch developments with interest. Remember, if you are on SSRI anti-depressants and you want to stop, do it gradually, don't ever stop suddenly as that way lies nasty side-effects.
Recent Comments